Airbus A320neo vs Comac C919
Top speed, range, size and history side by side. Each was built for its own job, so this shows how they differ, not which is better.
The Airbus A320neo is faster: 870 km/h against 834 km/h for the Comac C919. The Airbus A320neo flies further: 6,300 km against 5,555 km for the Comac C919. The Airbus A320neo is heavier at takeoff: 79 tonnes against 79 tonnes for the Comac C919. The Airbus A320neo first flew in 2014, 3 years before the Comac C919 (2017).
| Airbus A320neo | Comac C919 |
|---|
| Top speed | 870 km/h (541 mph) | 834 km/h (518 mph) |
|---|
| Range | 6,300 km (3,915 miles) | 5,555 km (3,452 miles) |
|---|
| Length | 37.6 m (123 ft) | 38.9 m (128 ft) |
|---|
| Wingspan | 35.8 m (117 ft) | 35.8 m (117 ft) |
|---|
| Max takeoff weight | 79 t (174,163 lb) | 79 t (173,943 lb) |
|---|
| First flight | 2014 | 2017 |
|---|
| Crew and capacity | 2 crew, 180 seats typical | 2 crew, 158 to 192 seats |
|---|
| Engines | 2 × LEAP-1A or PW1100G | 2 × LEAP-1C |
|---|
| Built by | Airbus | Comac |
|---|
| Country | Europe | China |
|---|
Compare them in Hangar 48
More about each
Other comparisons